Photography, Music, Fractal Art

Another Stowasser tárogató–in B natural!

I found a lovely looking Stowasser tárogató for sale rather cheap, and decided to go ahead and buy it, thinking to compare it to the one I already had and to keep one and sell the other. When it arrived, I was flabbergasted to find out that the instrument was in B natural. I had no idea such beasts existed, but here was one in front of me. After getting over my annoyance, I realized that this was not actually a bad thing. I now have a set of three tárogatók by Stowasser, in Bb, B and C!   🙂

The instrument is unique in several ways, apart from being in such a strange key. I’ll explain with photographs:

_DSC8025Here is the instrument. When I first picked it up something felt strange. It was too smooth. The keys were too shiny. Stowasser did lacquer their instruments, but the lacquer was clear and the coat was very thin. The keys were always matte. This was clearly a Stowasser instrument, but it was obvious that at some point in its long life both the wood and the keys had been highly polished, and a rather thick coat of tinted lacquer had been applied. But everything about the instrument is in beautiful shape, and it plays excellently.

_DSC8045Another shot of the whole instrument. You can see that the Stowasser logos are present, but very faint due to the buffing of the wood.

_DSC8032

_DSC8038Shiny keys and shiny wood, and the first interesting thing to note: Look at the small key between the top finger hole and the second hole with the ring. Now look down to the axle connecting that key with the ring key next to it. Note that the axle has been cut just to the left of the ring key and that there is a pin in the axle just above that. This is an excellent modification that allows the fork F fingering to be played without depressing the Eb key with the pinky, because it allows the resonance F key to lift when the middle finger is lifted. On almost all tárogatók, this axle is unitary. It’s a great idea, and I don’t know why Stowasser didn’t adopt it, but this customization and the polishing indicate that this instrument must have been prized.

_DSC8047Now here’s the strangest thing: look at that this Eb trill key. Normally it is independent, as can be seen on the instrument on the right. But here is is very nicely put on an extended axle.

_DSC8029Not only that–I have seen that arrangement on one other Stowasser–but look at the pad cup arrangement here: two cups on one key, set at right angles to each other. I have no idea what this was about, but obviously the Stowasser factory was open to improvisation…

_DSC8050Another interesting thing is the long thumb Bb key. Most Stowassers have a side-throw key, as can be seen on the upper instrument. The long straight key with a very short perpendicular axle was the original style developed by Schunda and is still being used, but the side-throw key was Stowasser’s signature design, and has some advantages. This B natural instrument has the latest of the Stowasser keywork, so it is not an early model. I can only guess that this key design was requested for some reason by the client. I would love to know what options were available in those days…

_DSC8051Here are the linkages at the bell.

_DSC8049Lastly, here is my “Stowasser set”. The Bb instrument is at the top, then the B natural and the one in C. Don’t let the length of the C instrument fool you, because as explained in another post, this instrument is extended to low A. It’s interesting to note that the bell design is quite different–different lengths with different sized holes. All have ten holes: two rows of five, but I know of at least one Stowasser with only eight holes: a top row of three and a bottom row of five.

_DSC8048One last shot of the central parts of the three instruments. There are differences. Notice that while the top trill key on the top and bottom instruments are similar, the top Bb instrument has it in line with the ring keys, while the C instrument at the bottom has it offset to the side. Stowasser also used both black and orange rollers, for what reason I have no idea. But if you look you can easily see that the key designs are similar, mostly consistent, and a good way to identify Stowasser instruments. It should be noted that for the little finger keys on both hands, there seems to have been a option of either flat keys with rollers or rounded keys without, similar to those for the right hand of the oboe. It certainly does seem that Stowasser offered some options.

 

7 Comments

  1. Fernando Pernas
    2018/01/01 @ 21:51

    Thank you for your information. I’m a clarinrt player and i began to have interess in tarogato. Your information was importat for me. Thank you and best regards!

    Reply

  2. Marius Lar
    2019/08/13 @ 14:35

    Hi is still available for sale?

    Reply

    • tobylog1
      2019/08/26 @ 03:31

      Hi Marius–I’m not thinking of selling it at the moment

      Reply

  3. Cipri
    2022/01/03 @ 12:50

    Hi . I’ts available for sale ?

    Reply

    • tobylog1
      2022/01/04 @ 01:09

      Hi, not thinking to sell it at the moment

      Reply

  4. Jamie Eriksen
    2022/12/24 @ 19:12

    Hi,

    I think I may have also found a “B” Tarogato. Can you tell me how long both of your instruments are without the top mouthpiece tenon? Thanks!

    Reply

    • tobylog1
      2023/01/18 @ 02:58

      I am not at home. Will answer when I can.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *